<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Toad?  Hip-hop?  The Waiting Room?  You Must be&#160;Mental!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://songbytoad.com/2008/03/toad-hip-hop-the-waiting-room-you-must-be-mental/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/03/toad-hip-hop-the-waiting-room-you-must-be-mental/</link>
	<description>Independent and alternative music in Scotland - with a shitload of gin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:06:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/03/toad-hip-hop-the-waiting-room-you-must-be-mental/#comment-3845</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 13:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=1447#comment-3845</guid>
		<description>Thanks Floorman, I will definitely get stuck into those two links.  As I said above, it is the commercial face of hip hop that has put me off, but in my ignorance it&#039;s very hard to just pick out the really good places to find the thoughtful stuff.

I make no claim of superiority for &#039;my&#039; genre though, because with a few exceptions mainstream indie has been awful for a while too, but I don&#039;t get the impression that the truly aggressively anti-social stuff has been quite so bad.

I am still trying to figure out where the awful cartoonish portrayal is coming from - from within the community itself, from marketing execs trying to sell to a suburban audience, from execs who want a simplistically defined product, or from whom?

Maybe it&#039;s like many prejudicial stereotypes: starts off outside the community in question and is slowly co-opted by them as a way of taking it off the people who are prejudiced against them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Floorman, I will definitely get stuck into those two links.  As I said above, it is the commercial face of hip hop that has put me off, but in my ignorance it&#8217;s very hard to just pick out the really good places to find the thoughtful stuff.</p>
<p>I make no claim of superiority for &#8216;my&#8217; genre though, because with a few exceptions mainstream indie has been awful for a while too, but I don&#8217;t get the impression that the truly aggressively anti-social stuff has been quite so bad.</p>
<p>I am still trying to figure out where the awful cartoonish portrayal is coming from &#8211; from within the community itself, from marketing execs trying to sell to a suburban audience, from execs who want a simplistically defined product, or from whom?</p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s like many prejudicial stereotypes: starts off outside the community in question and is slowly co-opted by them as a way of taking it off the people who are prejudiced against them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floorman</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/03/toad-hip-hop-the-waiting-room-you-must-be-mental/#comment-3844</link>
		<dc:creator>floorman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:11:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=1447#comment-3844</guid>
		<description>Wow, talk about a blog to get a debate started.

Yes, there is an enormous amount of ugly pigheaded hiphop sprayed all over the media, but there is as much again, maybe more clever, thoughtful, conscious, witty, self-deprecating and downright life-affirming music out there if you can be bothered to look beyond MTV and shite payola radio.

I make a point of never watching music tv, reading mainstream music/style mags, listening to corporate radio. I get  my new music from switched-on friends and djs, conscious bloggers, internet radio, good record shops -remember them? - for great hiphop try:

http://www.fatcity.co.uk/sales/

The renewed enjoyment I&#039;ve found in music over the past ten or more years since I ditched any form of advertised/hyped music has been immense, and has led me to discover many amazing artists and tracks. Hiphop, as can be said for so much music today, is a genuine artform that has been perverted by the industry to reinforce stereotypes and make a ton of money.

Roots Manuva&#039;s Witness never fails to get a party started (or provide the end of night anthem). I have just done a dirty re-edit which you can find on my blog-

http://floormanpresents.blogspot.com/

Keep on digging for the goodstuff, and stop buying/listening to the bad - then it may stop...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, talk about a blog to get a debate started.</p>
<p>Yes, there is an enormous amount of ugly pigheaded hiphop sprayed all over the media, but there is as much again, maybe more clever, thoughtful, conscious, witty, self-deprecating and downright life-affirming music out there if you can be bothered to look beyond MTV and shite payola radio.</p>
<p>I make a point of never watching music tv, reading mainstream music/style mags, listening to corporate radio. I get  my new music from switched-on friends and djs, conscious bloggers, internet radio, good record shops -remember them? &#8211; for great hiphop try:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fatcity.co.uk/sales/" rel="nofollow">http://www.fatcity.co.uk/sales/</a></p>
<p>The renewed enjoyment I&#8217;ve found in music over the past ten or more years since I ditched any form of advertised/hyped music has been immense, and has led me to discover many amazing artists and tracks. Hiphop, as can be said for so much music today, is a genuine artform that has been perverted by the industry to reinforce stereotypes and make a ton of money.</p>
<p>Roots Manuva&#8217;s Witness never fails to get a party started (or provide the end of night anthem). I have just done a dirty re-edit which you can find on my blog-</p>
<p><a href="http://floormanpresents.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://floormanpresents.blogspot.com/</a></p>
<p>Keep on digging for the goodstuff, and stop buying/listening to the bad &#8211; then it may stop&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drunk Country</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/03/toad-hip-hop-the-waiting-room-you-must-be-mental/#comment-3847</link>
		<dc:creator>Drunk Country</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=1447#comment-3847</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what happens when there&#039;s a crashing come down after almost a month of furiously frantic running around like a fucking idiot all over the States &amp; Europe only to find Monday morning it all starts again, but in a slightly different direction.  All that locked in partially interesting/useful trivia shit &amp; bollocks, usually firmed down by too much &#039;work&#039; brainweight, has to perculate &amp; bubble to the surface at some point.

I promise I&#039;ll behave the next time you go away.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what happens when there&#8217;s a crashing come down after almost a month of furiously frantic running around like a fucking idiot all over the States &amp; Europe only to find Monday morning it all starts again, but in a slightly different direction.  All that locked in partially interesting/useful trivia shit &amp; bollocks, usually firmed down by too much &#8216;work&#8217; brainweight, has to perculate &amp; bubble to the surface at some point.</p>
<p>I promise I&#8217;ll behave the next time you go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/03/toad-hip-hop-the-waiting-room-you-must-be-mental/#comment-3849</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=1447#comment-3849</guid>
		<description>Christ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/03/toad-hip-hop-the-waiting-room-you-must-be-mental/#comment-3851</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=1447#comment-3851</guid>
		<description>Good work DC! Fascinating.

I always thought of cwtch as a tender and compassionate word, used as it in Welsh families to mean &#039;cuddle&#039;.

From now on I&#039;ll think twice when someone says &quot;Aww.. give us a cwtch..&quot;

And you&#039;ve given me a delicious new term of endearment to use on my mates down the pub.. &quot;Oi! You fuckin&#039; quimwedge!&quot;

Lovely, lovely stuff..

Cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good work DC! Fascinating.</p>
<p>I always thought of cwtch as a tender and compassionate word, used as it in Welsh families to mean &#8216;cuddle&#8217;.</p>
<p>From now on I&#8217;ll think twice when someone says &#8220;Aww.. give us a cwtch..&#8221;</p>
<p>And you&#8217;ve given me a delicious new term of endearment to use on my mates down the pub.. &#8220;Oi! You fuckin&#8217; quimwedge!&#8221;</p>
<p>Lovely, lovely stuff..</p>
<p>Cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Campfires &#38; Battlefields</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/03/toad-hip-hop-the-waiting-room-you-must-be-mental/#comment-3850</link>
		<dc:creator>Campfires &#38; Battlefields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:03:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=1447#comment-3850</guid>
		<description>What a bunch of twats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a bunch of twats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marxsbeard</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/03/toad-hip-hop-the-waiting-room-you-must-be-mental/#comment-3848</link>
		<dc:creator>marxsbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=1447#comment-3848</guid>
		<description>hah.  entirely missed the alisalove comment and spent the past ten minutes wondering if my flippant use of the see-en-you-tee word had provoked some kind of etymological debate.  and it wisnae me...

quite the response drunk country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hah.  entirely missed the alisalove comment and spent the past ten minutes wondering if my flippant use of the see-en-you-tee word had provoked some kind of etymological debate.  and it wisnae me&#8230;</p>
<p>quite the response drunk country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drunk Country</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/03/toad-hip-hop-the-waiting-room-you-must-be-mental/#comment-3852</link>
		<dc:creator>Drunk Country</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=1447#comment-3852</guid>
		<description>oops, I missed the *, so here it is now: *by shocking I do not mean shocking for the absolute simple art of shocking; I&#039;m talking about its aesthetic purpose. It&#039;s like seeing blood on snow or a single white light in an otherwise unlit environment.  The aesthetic of the langauge we use &amp; propogate is as important as the arrangement of &amp; function therafter (of any individual word or phrase &amp; its link to its immediate environment) in the role of communication.  Cunt, for me, is a deeply satisfying word not least because of the historical fear of its place in the English language.  It&#039;s terribly unfortunate that from its original place in our language&#039;s birth (i.e. the first known recording of that combination of letters was in the London street name from about 1230.  That street name was, interestingly, &lt;i&gt;Gropecuntelane&lt;/i&gt;, one of a warren of streets &amp; alleyways all given over to the lowest forms of prostitution &amp; bawdry) it is now considered a derogatory term towards women - this is a gross misunderstanding of its history &amp; underlying usage.

Yes, it has female/sexual links (that cannot be denied) but, like a whole host of words which are now in common use &amp; no longer bear the mark of &#039;violently&#039; derogatory due to the passage of time &amp; assimilation, it is only offensive to those who carry the baggage of a long dead direct association (specifically, in this case, to a derogatory term meaning &#039;whore&#039; or &#039;prostitute&#039;).  It gets flak because it is such a powerful cnostruction of a word in itself - mono-syllabic, heavy on vowel expression, the hardness of the &quot;cuh&quot; &amp; &quot;nnn&quot; sounds, &amp; the stress relationship between the &#039;uh&#039; &amp; the &#039;tuh&#039; sounds,  all add up to the way it bursts out of your mouth even when said softly.  Some may consider this &#039;sound&#039; aggressive or offensive, I consider it almost a perfect word albeit one that should be used wisely &amp; economically, yet devoid of censorship &amp; misguided fear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, I missed the *, so here it is now: *by shocking I do not mean shocking for the absolute simple art of shocking; I&#8217;m talking about its aesthetic purpose. It&#8217;s like seeing blood on snow or a single white light in an otherwise unlit environment.  The aesthetic of the langauge we use &amp; propogate is as important as the arrangement of &amp; function therafter (of any individual word or phrase &amp; its link to its immediate environment) in the role of communication.  Cunt, for me, is a deeply satisfying word not least because of the historical fear of its place in the English language.  It&#8217;s terribly unfortunate that from its original place in our language&#8217;s birth (i.e. the first known recording of that combination of letters was in the London street name from about 1230.  That street name was, interestingly, <i>Gropecuntelane</i>, one of a warren of streets &amp; alleyways all given over to the lowest forms of prostitution &amp; bawdry) it is now considered a derogatory term towards women &#8211; this is a gross misunderstanding of its history &amp; underlying usage.</p>
<p>Yes, it has female/sexual links (that cannot be denied) but, like a whole host of words which are now in common use &amp; no longer bear the mark of &#8216;violently&#8217; derogatory due to the passage of time &amp; assimilation, it is only offensive to those who carry the baggage of a long dead direct association (specifically, in this case, to a derogatory term meaning &#8216;whore&#8217; or &#8216;prostitute&#8217;).  It gets flak because it is such a powerful cnostruction of a word in itself &#8211; mono-syllabic, heavy on vowel expression, the hardness of the &#8220;cuh&#8221; &amp; &#8220;nnn&#8221; sounds, &amp; the stress relationship between the &#8216;uh&#8217; &amp; the &#8216;tuh&#8217; sounds,  all add up to the way it bursts out of your mouth even when said softly.  Some may consider this &#8217;sound&#8217; aggressive or offensive, I consider it almost a perfect word albeit one that should be used wisely &amp; economically, yet devoid of censorship &amp; misguided fear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drunk Country</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/03/toad-hip-hop-the-waiting-room-you-must-be-mental/#comment-3853</link>
		<dc:creator>Drunk Country</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 16:01:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=1447#comment-3853</guid>
		<description>alisalove: I have to tread very carefully here because we are getting into etymology &amp; sexual politics &amp; the interpretation of each - which is always a fucking doozie of a mix when dealing with derogatory language systems.

Cunt isn&#039;t a word that&#039;s in general use in Drunk COuntry House mainly because I think it is (a) a beauiful word in danger of being anethetised through over use &amp; (b) quite a shocking word*, again in danger of being anethetised through over use.  Now, you might counter, I use it a handful of times in my poorly informed diatribes above &amp; therefore am adding to the dumbing/numbing of its overall effect.  I do, I hope, use it with some tongue in cheek &amp; not too inaccessible humour &amp; it is considered as such; I also do like the use of the word (in the same way as Fuck or Nigger - another beautiful word with such damning connotations - are sometimes used) as a shock device i.e. usage for usage sake in the complete polar opposite of its usual &#039;comfort&#039; zone (think the Tea Shop scene in &lt;i&gt;Withnail &amp; I&lt;/i&gt;).

However, &amp; this is where I am positive our paths, alisalove, most certainly divide, I am using the term with its contemporary usage &amp; meaning - i.e. as an insult absolutely not directly associated with female genitalia.  In the UK at least it&#039;s a long time since Cunt has been a serious &amp; direct associate of Pussy, Vagina, Fanny, Snatch, et al.  I don&#039;t even think it&#039;s that prevalent in the hardcore porn industry these days, simply because it isn&#039;t deemed a particularly attractive term, even when utilized within the sexually semi-aggressive context of &quot;fuck me in my fucking tight, wet cunt you fucking fuck; I love it&quot; or somesuch.

I get the juxtapositioning of the insult &amp; its assumed comparison with the female sex organ, i.e. the usual aggression behind the usage must therefore transfer to the user&#039;s opinion of the female genitalia &amp;, by proxy, females themselves.  That, I think, really is a very old &amp; lazy method of crying victim for the sake of crying victim.  If nothing else that statement alone will probably have me hunted down by a radical feminist element.

A short history lesson courtesy of a handful of etymology sites that can reduce the thinking on this kind of topic far neater than I:  Cunt is believed to derive from a Germanic root &lt;i&gt;kunton&lt;/i&gt; &quot;female genitalia&quot;, which also gave rise to Old Norse &lt;i&gt;kunta&lt;/i&gt; (ancestor of Norwegian &amp; Swedish dialectical &lt;i&gt;kunta&lt;/i&gt; &amp; Danish dialectical kunte), Old Frisian, Middle Low German &amp; Middle Dutch &lt;i&gt;kunte&lt;/i&gt;, &amp; the English doublet &lt;i&gt;quaint&lt;/i&gt;.

By the way, the word wasn&#039;t always considered derogatory, even though it is today.  Be careful about assuming that a word&#039;s modern connotations must have governed its formation.  Also, no connection has been made between the Germanic &amp; Latin &lt;i&gt;cunnus&lt;/i&gt;.  The proto-Germanic root of cunt is ku- i.e. &quot;hollow place&quot;, while the Indo-European root of Latin &lt;i&gt;cunnus&lt;/i&gt; is (s)keu- &quot;to cover, to conceal&quot;, the etymological meaning of cunnus being &quot;sheath&quot;.

&#039;Cu&#039; also has associations with knowledge: &#039;can&#039; &amp; &#039;ken&#039; (both &#039;to know&#039;) evolved from the &#039;cu&#039;/&#039;ku&#039; prefix.  Indeed, there is a significant linguistic connection between sex &amp; knowledge: one can &#039;conceive&#039; both an idea &amp; a baby, and &#039;ken&#039; means both &#039;know&#039; &amp; &#039;give birth&#039;. &#039;Ken&#039; shares a genealogical meaning with &#039;kin&#039; &amp; &#039;kind&#039;, from the Old English &#039;cyn&#039; &amp; the Gothic &#039;kuni&#039;

In Celtic &amp; modern Welsh, &#039;cu&#039; is rendered as &#039;cw&#039;, a similarly feminine prefix influencing the Old English &#039;cwithe&#039; (&#039;womb&#039;), from the Welsh &#039;cwtch&#039;. Interestingly, &#039;cwtch&#039; (also &#039;cwtch&#039;, with modern forms &#039;cwts&#039; and &#039;cwtsh&#039;) means &#039;hollow place&#039; as a noun (&amp; is thus another vaginal metaphor) &amp; &#039;hide&#039; as a verb. &#039;Cwm&#039; also shares the &#039;cw&#039; prefix, however its feminine origins seem initially perplexing, as it means &#039;valley&#039;. In fact, this topographical definition is clearly a vaginal metaphor, as valleys are as furrowed &amp; fertile as vaginas (although the Welsh slang words for &#039;vagina&#039; are &#039;cont&#039; &amp; &#039;chuint&#039; rather than &#039;cwm&#039;). Viz magazine (William H Bollocks, 1997) punned on the sound of the Welsh phrase &#039;pobol y cwm&#039; (&#039;people of the valley&#039;) with &#039;pobolycwm&#039;, defined as &quot;people who like quim&quot;.

&#039;Cwm&#039; is pronounced &#039;come&#039;, though &#039;quim&#039;, an English slang term for &#039;vagina&#039;, is a mispronounced Anglicisation of it.  &#039;Quim&#039; has been extended to form &#039;quimwedge&#039; (literally &#039;vaginal wedge&#039;, thus &#039;penis&#039;), which is especially interesting as it utilises &#039;wedge&#039; to mean &#039;penis&#039; when, in fact, &#039;cunt&#039; itself derives from the Latin for &#039;wedge&#039; (&#039;cuneus&#039;).

So there&#039;s a lot of reasons the word&#039;s meaning/usage has evolved from simply female genitalia to a direct, aggressive, vulgar insult.  All the connotations of &amp; interpretive values of the sexual possibilities of the variants of the word&#039;s origins are all mixed up with the formation of, as we know it, the English language.

The transgression of the F-Bomb, as my mate Ed in New York calls it, is a serious factor in the retardation of said common language - by that he means the more in use, say, the Fuck word is, the more available it is to vulnerable ears who retain its function minus the impact, the less of a threat it becomes, the less of a statement it makes &amp; so on.  Cunt is used as punctuation in certain parts of my home city (&amp; I know for an absolute fact it is used without flinch, almost like breathing in &amp; out, in certain parts of Edinburgh &amp; Glasgow &amp; the like) - the traveller encampments on the fringes of  Cardiff for example, parents &amp; children, are littered with its use (albeit with bile &amp; gritted teeth).  BUT I know for a fact it is not consciously used as a comparison to or an opinion of a lady&#039;s front bum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alisalove: I have to tread very carefully here because we are getting into etymology &amp; sexual politics &amp; the interpretation of each &#8211; which is always a fucking doozie of a mix when dealing with derogatory language systems.</p>
<p>Cunt isn&#8217;t a word that&#8217;s in general use in Drunk COuntry House mainly because I think it is (a) a beauiful word in danger of being anethetised through over use &amp; (b) quite a shocking word*, again in danger of being anethetised through over use.  Now, you might counter, I use it a handful of times in my poorly informed diatribes above &amp; therefore am adding to the dumbing/numbing of its overall effect.  I do, I hope, use it with some tongue in cheek &amp; not too inaccessible humour &amp; it is considered as such; I also do like the use of the word (in the same way as Fuck or Nigger &#8211; another beautiful word with such damning connotations &#8211; are sometimes used) as a shock device i.e. usage for usage sake in the complete polar opposite of its usual &#8216;comfort&#8217; zone (think the Tea Shop scene in <i>Withnail &amp; I</i>).</p>
<p>However, &amp; this is where I am positive our paths, alisalove, most certainly divide, I am using the term with its contemporary usage &amp; meaning &#8211; i.e. as an insult absolutely not directly associated with female genitalia.  In the UK at least it&#8217;s a long time since Cunt has been a serious &amp; direct associate of Pussy, Vagina, Fanny, Snatch, et al.  I don&#8217;t even think it&#8217;s that prevalent in the hardcore porn industry these days, simply because it isn&#8217;t deemed a particularly attractive term, even when utilized within the sexually semi-aggressive context of &#8220;fuck me in my fucking tight, wet cunt you fucking fuck; I love it&#8221; or somesuch.</p>
<p>I get the juxtapositioning of the insult &amp; its assumed comparison with the female sex organ, i.e. the usual aggression behind the usage must therefore transfer to the user&#8217;s opinion of the female genitalia &amp;, by proxy, females themselves.  That, I think, really is a very old &amp; lazy method of crying victim for the sake of crying victim.  If nothing else that statement alone will probably have me hunted down by a radical feminist element.</p>
<p>A short history lesson courtesy of a handful of etymology sites that can reduce the thinking on this kind of topic far neater than I:  Cunt is believed to derive from a Germanic root <i>kunton</i> &#8220;female genitalia&#8221;, which also gave rise to Old Norse <i>kunta</i> (ancestor of Norwegian &amp; Swedish dialectical <i>kunta</i> &amp; Danish dialectical kunte), Old Frisian, Middle Low German &amp; Middle Dutch <i>kunte</i>, &amp; the English doublet <i>quaint</i>.</p>
<p>By the way, the word wasn&#8217;t always considered derogatory, even though it is today.  Be careful about assuming that a word&#8217;s modern connotations must have governed its formation.  Also, no connection has been made between the Germanic &amp; Latin <i>cunnus</i>.  The proto-Germanic root of cunt is ku- i.e. &#8220;hollow place&#8221;, while the Indo-European root of Latin <i>cunnus</i> is (s)keu- &#8220;to cover, to conceal&#8221;, the etymological meaning of cunnus being &#8220;sheath&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8216;Cu&#8217; also has associations with knowledge: &#8216;can&#8217; &amp; &#8216;ken&#8217; (both &#8216;to know&#8217;) evolved from the &#8216;cu&#8217;/'ku&#8217; prefix.  Indeed, there is a significant linguistic connection between sex &amp; knowledge: one can &#8216;conceive&#8217; both an idea &amp; a baby, and &#8216;ken&#8217; means both &#8216;know&#8217; &amp; &#8216;give birth&#8217;. &#8216;Ken&#8217; shares a genealogical meaning with &#8216;kin&#8217; &amp; &#8216;kind&#8217;, from the Old English &#8216;cyn&#8217; &amp; the Gothic &#8216;kuni&#8217;</p>
<p>In Celtic &amp; modern Welsh, &#8216;cu&#8217; is rendered as &#8216;cw&#8217;, a similarly feminine prefix influencing the Old English &#8216;cwithe&#8217; (&#8216;womb&#8217;), from the Welsh &#8216;cwtch&#8217;. Interestingly, &#8216;cwtch&#8217; (also &#8216;cwtch&#8217;, with modern forms &#8216;cwts&#8217; and &#8216;cwtsh&#8217;) means &#8216;hollow place&#8217; as a noun (&amp; is thus another vaginal metaphor) &amp; &#8216;hide&#8217; as a verb. &#8216;Cwm&#8217; also shares the &#8216;cw&#8217; prefix, however its feminine origins seem initially perplexing, as it means &#8216;valley&#8217;. In fact, this topographical definition is clearly a vaginal metaphor, as valleys are as furrowed &amp; fertile as vaginas (although the Welsh slang words for &#8216;vagina&#8217; are &#8216;cont&#8217; &amp; &#8216;chuint&#8217; rather than &#8216;cwm&#8217;). Viz magazine (William H Bollocks, 1997) punned on the sound of the Welsh phrase &#8216;pobol y cwm&#8217; (&#8216;people of the valley&#8217;) with &#8216;pobolycwm&#8217;, defined as &#8220;people who like quim&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8216;Cwm&#8217; is pronounced &#8216;come&#8217;, though &#8216;quim&#8217;, an English slang term for &#8216;vagina&#8217;, is a mispronounced Anglicisation of it.  &#8216;Quim&#8217; has been extended to form &#8216;quimwedge&#8217; (literally &#8216;vaginal wedge&#8217;, thus &#8216;penis&#8217;), which is especially interesting as it utilises &#8216;wedge&#8217; to mean &#8216;penis&#8217; when, in fact, &#8216;cunt&#8217; itself derives from the Latin for &#8216;wedge&#8217; (&#8216;cuneus&#8217;).</p>
<p>So there&#8217;s a lot of reasons the word&#8217;s meaning/usage has evolved from simply female genitalia to a direct, aggressive, vulgar insult.  All the connotations of &amp; interpretive values of the sexual possibilities of the variants of the word&#8217;s origins are all mixed up with the formation of, as we know it, the English language.</p>
<p>The transgression of the F-Bomb, as my mate Ed in New York calls it, is a serious factor in the retardation of said common language &#8211; by that he means the more in use, say, the Fuck word is, the more available it is to vulnerable ears who retain its function minus the impact, the less of a threat it becomes, the less of a statement it makes &amp; so on.  Cunt is used as punctuation in certain parts of my home city (&amp; I know for an absolute fact it is used without flinch, almost like breathing in &amp; out, in certain parts of Edinburgh &amp; Glasgow &amp; the like) &#8211; the traveller encampments on the fringes of  Cardiff for example, parents &amp; children, are littered with its use (albeit with bile &amp; gritted teeth).  BUT I know for a fact it is not consciously used as a comparison to or an opinion of a lady&#8217;s front bum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marxsbeard</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/03/toad-hip-hop-the-waiting-room-you-must-be-mental/#comment-3854</link>
		<dc:creator>marxsbeard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 12:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=1447#comment-3854</guid>
		<description>bit of an odd one for me this.  Find i&#039;m agreeing/disagreeing with bits of what everybody&#039;s saying.  For of the issue is that there&#039;s too much music, much of it dross, whether on an independent (what indie means to me) or major label, whether it&#039;s black or white, urban or suburban.  This obsession with genre, essentially a meaningless abstraction, is a result of this; an attempt to niche a product to a particular audience, to make it stand out, to attach it to something else for ease of identification.  How do you market anything if it&#039;s simply some amorphous bloc like &#039;music&#039; or &#039;food&#039; or &#039;clothes&#039;?

Not sure what dylan means by enlightened minority either.  If anyone&#039;s ever read the drowned in sound boards and comments you&#039;d quickly realise the enlightened minority all sound like snobby cunts :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bit of an odd one for me this.  Find i&#8217;m agreeing/disagreeing with bits of what everybody&#8217;s saying.  For of the issue is that there&#8217;s too much music, much of it dross, whether on an independent (what indie means to me) or major label, whether it&#8217;s black or white, urban or suburban.  This obsession with genre, essentially a meaningless abstraction, is a result of this; an attempt to niche a product to a particular audience, to make it stand out, to attach it to something else for ease of identification.  How do you market anything if it&#8217;s simply some amorphous bloc like &#8216;music&#8217; or &#8216;food&#8217; or &#8216;clothes&#8217;?</p>
<p>Not sure what dylan means by enlightened minority either.  If anyone&#8217;s ever read the drowned in sound boards and comments you&#8217;d quickly realise the enlightened minority all sound like snobby cunts <img src='http://songbytoad.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
