<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Milestones # 3: James &#8211;&#160;Laid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://songbytoad.com/2008/08/milestones-3-james-laid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/08/milestones-3-james-laid/</link>
	<description>Independent music from Edinburgh, Scotland - with added gin and swearing.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:07:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/08/milestones-3-james-laid/#comment-6366</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=2136#comment-6366</guid>
		<description>Stutter is vastly better, it&#039;s just obvious.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stutter is vastly better, it&#8217;s just obvious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Campfires &#38; Battlefields</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/08/milestones-3-james-laid/#comment-6372</link>
		<dc:creator>Campfires &#38; Battlefields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 14:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=2136#comment-6372</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Stutter&lt;/i&gt; is better because it&#039;s exactly 39 minutes and 51 seconds long.  I mean, &lt;i&gt;Laid&lt;/i&gt; is good, but I think we can all agree that it&#039;s not 39:51.  Damn!  39:51!  That&#039;s off the hook!  (&lt;i&gt;snigger&lt;/i&gt;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Stutter</i> is better because it&#8217;s exactly 39 minutes and 51 seconds long.  I mean, <i>Laid</i> is good, but I think we can all agree that it&#8217;s not 39:51.  Damn!  39:51!  That&#8217;s off the hook!  (<i>snigger</i>).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/08/milestones-3-james-laid/#comment-6371</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=2136#comment-6371</guid>
		<description>I did say if anyone slagged off &lt;i&gt;Laid&lt;/i&gt; I was going to go round and punch them in the eye.

Oh, hang on, I &lt;i&gt;thought&lt;/i&gt; about saying it.

Either way, if anyone genuinely believes &lt;i&gt;Stutter&lt;/i&gt; is a superior work to &lt;i&gt;Laid&lt;/i&gt;; fair enough, let&#039;s hear your argument.

If, on the other hand, you simply happen to &lt;i&gt;like&lt;/i&gt; it better, then that&#039;s a matter of personal taste, but make sure that&#039;s what you say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did say if anyone slagged off <i>Laid</i> I was going to go round and punch them in the eye.</p>
<p>Oh, hang on, I <i>thought</i> about saying it.</p>
<p>Either way, if anyone genuinely believes <i>Stutter</i> is a superior work to <i>Laid</i>; fair enough, let&#8217;s hear your argument.</p>
<p>If, on the other hand, you simply happen to <i>like</i> it better, then that&#8217;s a matter of personal taste, but make sure that&#8217;s what you say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Campfires &#38; Battlefields</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/08/milestones-3-james-laid/#comment-6370</link>
		<dc:creator>Campfires &#38; Battlefields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:38:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=2136#comment-6370</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m loving &lt;i&gt;Stutter&lt;/i&gt; right now, having just picked up a new copy after having lost my old one.  It&#039;s so different from &lt;i&gt;Laid&lt;/i&gt;, with such a naivete and youthful exuberance to it, that I just don&#039;t really find much basis for comparison.  &lt;i&gt;Laid&lt;/i&gt; is without question a more mature, more complex record, but does that make it better? It&#039;s sort of like comparing &lt;i&gt;Rubber Soul&lt;/i&gt; to &lt;i&gt;Abbey Road&lt;/i&gt; and asking which is better.  Who cares?  I&#039;m just glad to have a chance to enjoy them both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m loving <i>Stutter</i> right now, having just picked up a new copy after having lost my old one.  It&#8217;s so different from <i>Laid</i>, with such a naivete and youthful exuberance to it, that I just don&#8217;t really find much basis for comparison.  <i>Laid</i> is without question a more mature, more complex record, but does that make it better? It&#8217;s sort of like comparing <i>Rubber Soul</i> to <i>Abbey Road</i> and asking which is better.  Who cares?  I&#8217;m just glad to have a chance to enjoy them both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/08/milestones-3-james-laid/#comment-6369</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=2136#comment-6369</guid>
		<description>Stutter is very good though.  And that Rich seems like a nice chap - he is actually a semi-frequent commenter here Dylan, so be nice to the chap.  Not that he presented much of an argument of course!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stutter is very good though.  And that Rich seems like a nice chap &#8211; he is actually a semi-frequent commenter here Dylan, so be nice to the chap.  Not that he presented much of an argument of course!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/08/milestones-3-james-laid/#comment-6368</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=2136#comment-6368</guid>
		<description>I called it pop in the sense that everything is pop to some degree.  I wasn&#039;t trying to pigeonhole or denigrate the album, which is a masterpiece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I called it pop in the sense that everything is pop to some degree.  I wasn&#8217;t trying to pigeonhole or denigrate the album, which is a masterpiece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dylan</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/08/milestones-3-james-laid/#comment-6367</link>
		<dc:creator>Dylan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:56:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=2136#comment-6367</guid>
		<description>I kind of fall between you guys regarding &lt;i&gt;Wah Wah&lt;/i&gt;.. Listening to it is fascinating in an academic way - as Sheila says it really is incredibly impressive that most* of these tracks were being born as we hear them

(*&lt;i&gt;Pressure&#039;s On&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Tomorrow&lt;/i&gt; had been written and rehearsed before recording.)

However, you don&#039;t get the same emotional reward from &lt;i&gt;Wah Wah&lt;/i&gt; that &lt;i&gt;Laid&lt;/i&gt; offers.

It&#039;s also interesting how such a complex record generates different responses in people. I wouldn&#039;t dream of referring to it as &#039;pop&#039;. I think the ambition, maturity, ingenuity, accomplishment and undeniable beauty of &lt;i&gt;Laid&lt;/i&gt; elevates beyond mere pop.

Rich, I spent two days composing that article, and fifteen years before that being blown away on a regular basis by &lt;i&gt;Laid&lt;/i&gt;.

If you&#039;ve got a coherent argument to explain why &lt;i&gt;Stutter&lt;/i&gt;&#039;s better, let&#039;s hear it. If not, fuck off. Don&#039;t drift through here with half a sentence and expect not to get shot down. Are you pissed? &lt;i&gt;Stutter&lt;/i&gt;&#039;s certainly an intriguing album and a fine debut. It has a couple of my favourite James songs aboard, but it&#039;s not better than &lt;i&gt;Laid&lt;/i&gt; by any measurement. And even if we&#039;re talking personal preferences and not sensible arguments, I prefer &lt;i&gt;Strip-Mine&lt;/i&gt; to &lt;i&gt;Stutter&lt;/i&gt; anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I kind of fall between you guys regarding <i>Wah Wah</i>.. Listening to it is fascinating in an academic way &#8211; as Sheila says it really is incredibly impressive that most* of these tracks were being born as we hear them</p>
<p>(*<i>Pressure&#8217;s On</i> and <i>Tomorrow</i> had been written and rehearsed before recording.)</p>
<p>However, you don&#8217;t get the same emotional reward from <i>Wah Wah</i> that <i>Laid</i> offers.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also interesting how such a complex record generates different responses in people. I wouldn&#8217;t dream of referring to it as &#8216;pop&#8217;. I think the ambition, maturity, ingenuity, accomplishment and undeniable beauty of <i>Laid</i> elevates beyond mere pop.</p>
<p>Rich, I spent two days composing that article, and fifteen years before that being blown away on a regular basis by <i>Laid</i>.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve got a coherent argument to explain why <i>Stutter</i>&#8216;s better, let&#8217;s hear it. If not, fuck off. Don&#8217;t drift through here with half a sentence and expect not to get shot down. Are you pissed? <i>Stutter</i>&#8216;s certainly an intriguing album and a fine debut. It has a couple of my favourite James songs aboard, but it&#8217;s not better than <i>Laid</i> by any measurement. And even if we&#8217;re talking personal preferences and not sensible arguments, I prefer <i>Strip-Mine</i> to <i>Stutter</i> anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/08/milestones-3-james-laid/#comment-6365</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=2136#comment-6365</guid>
		<description>Well I think I might just disagree here.  I heard the exact same thing, SheilaW, and bought Wah Wah on the strength of it, but I just wasn&#039;t that impressed.  It seemed a mile away from the tight, direct pop of Laid, as far as I could tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think I might just disagree here.  I heard the exact same thing, SheilaW, and bought Wah Wah on the strength of it, but I just wasn&#8217;t that impressed.  It seemed a mile away from the tight, direct pop of Laid, as far as I could tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SheilaW</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/08/milestones-3-james-laid/#comment-6364</link>
		<dc:creator>SheilaW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 00:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=2136#comment-6364</guid>
		<description>I agree that Laid is a great album but to fully appreciate it&#039;s uniqueness you really have to listen to its companion cd, Wah Wah.  These two albums were recorded at the same time using two studios.  Wah Wah is the unedited improvisations that lead to the songs that ended up on Laid.

Wah Wah highlights the true brilliance of the James/Brian Eno pairing.  Listening to these sessions and knowing that these songs are totally improvised humbles you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Laid is a great album but to fully appreciate it&#8217;s uniqueness you really have to listen to its companion cd, Wah Wah.  These two albums were recorded at the same time using two studios.  Wah Wah is the unedited improvisations that lead to the songs that ended up on Laid.</p>
<p>Wah Wah highlights the true brilliance of the James/Brian Eno pairing.  Listening to these sessions and knowing that these songs are totally improvised humbles you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RichC</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2008/08/milestones-3-james-laid/#comment-6363</link>
		<dc:creator>RichC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 21:02:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.wordpress.com/?p=2136#comment-6363</guid>
		<description>Stutter is the best James album - by far....

Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stutter is the best James album &#8211; by far&#8230;.</p>
<p>Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

