<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Son Volt &#8211; American Central&#160;Dust</title>
	<atom:link href="http://songbytoad.com/2009/07/son-volt-american-central-dust/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://songbytoad.com/2009/07/son-volt-american-central-dust/</link>
	<description>Independent and alternative music in Scotland - with a shitload of gin.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 06:59:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2009/07/son-volt-american-central-dust/#comment-24879</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.com/?p=6566#comment-24879</guid>
		<description>I actually like the restraint in the arrangements quite a lot. Where I &lt;I&gt;do&lt;/I&gt; agree with you is that I would prefer a bit more variety from song to song.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually like the restraint in the arrangements quite a lot. Where I <i>do</i> agree with you is that I would prefer a bit more variety from song to song.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NineBall</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2009/07/son-volt-american-central-dust/#comment-24874</link>
		<dc:creator>NineBall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.com/?p=6566#comment-24874</guid>
		<description>Yep - you&#039;ve got it.

I think what I was picking up from listening to this was that the arrangements were straightforward enough to be considered predictable. There&#039;s little immediately apparent to distinguish these players from any other jobbing session musician you might decide to rope in for the recording session.

There are one or two moments where someone does threaten to let loose, and you can almost imagine the band leader fixing them with a stare at that moment and wagging a finger, and the performance slips back into the mundane again.

These are a couple of great songs with well-wrought lyrics, which I feel are let down by listless (&quot;oomph&quot;-less?) arrangements and performances. This could be the reason it&#039;s taken you so long to appreciate the inherent quality hidden in the songs, because there&#039;s a dull patina of unstimulating familiarity to scrape away first.

I&#039;m not suggesting they should &quot;wig-out&quot; and add any overdriven stylophone or wah-wah kazoo just for shits and giggles; going a bit easier on the the sustain pedal on the piano might have been a start.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep &#8211; you&#8217;ve got it.</p>
<p>I think what I was picking up from listening to this was that the arrangements were straightforward enough to be considered predictable. There&#8217;s little immediately apparent to distinguish these players from any other jobbing session musician you might decide to rope in for the recording session.</p>
<p>There are one or two moments where someone does threaten to let loose, and you can almost imagine the band leader fixing them with a stare at that moment and wagging a finger, and the performance slips back into the mundane again.</p>
<p>These are a couple of great songs with well-wrought lyrics, which I feel are let down by listless (&#8220;oomph&#8221;-less?) arrangements and performances. This could be the reason it&#8217;s taken you so long to appreciate the inherent quality hidden in the songs, because there&#8217;s a dull patina of unstimulating familiarity to scrape away first.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not suggesting they should &#8220;wig-out&#8221; and add any overdriven stylophone or wah-wah kazoo just for shits and giggles; going a bit easier on the the sustain pedal on the piano might have been a start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2009/07/son-volt-american-central-dust/#comment-24871</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 12:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.com/?p=6566#comment-24871</guid>
		<description>Oomph as in flair &amp; imagination, rather than forcefulness?  I guess, although that&#039;s not really how I&#039;d interpret the word.

In any case, more imaginative arrangements certainly might make it more immediate, but might take away from that slow burn intimacy which is so nice once you really get into the album.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oomph as in flair &#038; imagination, rather than forcefulness?  I guess, although that&#8217;s not really how I&#8217;d interpret the word.</p>
<p>In any case, more imaginative arrangements certainly might make it more immediate, but might take away from that slow burn intimacy which is so nice once you really get into the album.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NineBall</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2009/07/son-volt-american-central-dust/#comment-24866</link>
		<dc:creator>NineBall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.com/?p=6566#comment-24866</guid>
		<description>I suppose it depends on your definiton of &quot;oomph&quot;.

You could define it as volume and compression during the recording, so that the finished mix has a degree of &quot;oomph&quot; while losing clarity and definition.

Or you could relate it to a more personal notion of &quot;oomph&quot; from the musicians at the arrangement stage; being brave and imaginitive, and having that certain get-up-and-go, so you have engaging and inventive plans for the songs before you set the tapes rolling.

I was going for the latter, but I could have been more clear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose it depends on your definiton of &#8220;oomph&#8221;.</p>
<p>You could define it as volume and compression during the recording, so that the finished mix has a degree of &#8220;oomph&#8221; while losing clarity and definition.</p>
<p>Or you could relate it to a more personal notion of &#8220;oomph&#8221; from the musicians at the arrangement stage; being brave and imaginitive, and having that certain get-up-and-go, so you have engaging and inventive plans for the songs before you set the tapes rolling.</p>
<p>I was going for the latter, but I could have been more clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2009/07/son-volt-american-central-dust/#comment-24852</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.com/?p=6566#comment-24852</guid>
		<description>NineBall - More room to breathe generally means &lt;i&gt;less&lt;/i&gt; oomph in the arrangements, doesn&#039;t it?  The problem with slow burners like this, of course, is that people more often than not won&#039;t bother to take the time at all, which is a shame, but I guess it does build you a solid base of genuine fans, which is presumably all most musicians want in the first place.

Linda - Cocaine and Ashes and Sultana are probably my favourites, but then I always did prefer the sad songs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NineBall &#8211; More room to breathe generally means <i>less</i> oomph in the arrangements, doesn&#8217;t it?  The problem with slow burners like this, of course, is that people more often than not won&#8217;t bother to take the time at all, which is a shame, but I guess it does build you a solid base of genuine fans, which is presumably all most musicians want in the first place.</p>
<p>Linda &#8211; Cocaine and Ashes and Sultana are probably my favourites, but then I always did prefer the sad songs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2009/07/son-volt-american-central-dust/#comment-24842</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.com/?p=6566#comment-24842</guid>
		<description>I have listened to Son Volt only sporadically since Trace, which I loved, although I recently bought the 2002 soundtrack of the film The Slaughter Rule, which Farrar recorded.  I can say that I instantly like &quot;Cocaine and Ashes&quot; because fiddle like that will always suck me in.  Thanks, Matt, I will be sure to give this album a try.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have listened to Son Volt only sporadically since Trace, which I loved, although I recently bought the 2002 soundtrack of the film The Slaughter Rule, which Farrar recorded.  I can say that I instantly like &#8220;Cocaine and Ashes&#8221; because fiddle like that will always suck me in.  Thanks, Matt, I will be sure to give this album a try.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NineBall</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2009/07/son-volt-american-central-dust/#comment-24841</link>
		<dc:creator>NineBall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 13:47:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.com/?p=6566#comment-24841</guid>
		<description>These are pleasant enough, aren&#039;t they?

There are moments when you wish they&#039;d put a little more oomph into the arrangements - not go wild - but perhaps give the songs a little more room to breathe.

But maybe that&#039;s missing the point, and that in another twentty listens - as you suggested Matthew - it will all drop into place.

Loving the retro look to that album cover too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are pleasant enough, aren&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>There are moments when you wish they&#8217;d put a little more oomph into the arrangements &#8211; not go wild &#8211; but perhaps give the songs a little more room to breathe.</p>
<p>But maybe that&#8217;s missing the point, and that in another twentty listens &#8211; as you suggested Matthew &#8211; it will all drop into place.</p>
<p>Loving the retro look to that album cover too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2009/07/son-volt-american-central-dust/#comment-24838</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.com/?p=6566#comment-24838</guid>
		<description>Tim - yes, so did I, and it took a lot of listens to get into.  I did get into it though.

Euan - duly altered.  Fucking hell.  That&#039;s what comes from trying to write posts during your lunch break and not reading them back to yourself properly.  Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim &#8211; yes, so did I, and it took a lot of listens to get into.  I did get into it though.</p>
<p>Euan &#8211; duly altered.  Fucking hell.  That&#8217;s what comes from trying to write posts during your lunch break and not reading them back to yourself properly.  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euan</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2009/07/son-volt-american-central-dust/#comment-24837</link>
		<dc:creator>Euan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.com/?p=6566#comment-24837</guid>
		<description>don&#039;t want to be pernickity, but when exactly was jay farrar in wilco?  i think you&#039;re getting your jays mixed up again sir!  jay farrar and jeff tweedy were both in uncle tupelo before jf formed son volt and jt wilco.  jay bennet was in wilco.  he&#039;s the dead one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>don&#8217;t want to be pernickity, but when exactly was jay farrar in wilco?  i think you&#8217;re getting your jays mixed up again sir!  jay farrar and jeff tweedy were both in uncle tupelo before jf formed son volt and jt wilco.  jay bennet was in wilco.  he&#8217;s the dead one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://songbytoad.com/2009/07/son-volt-american-central-dust/#comment-24836</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://songbytoad.com/?p=6566#comment-24836</guid>
		<description>I wrote this off as bland/boring pretty quickly. Maybe I&#039;ll give it another listen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote this off as bland/boring pretty quickly. Maybe I&#8217;ll give it another listen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
