Song, by Toad

avatar

Screen Bandita presents: Unseen Footage from the Alan Lomax Archive

Well well well, this was a bloody great event. Alan Lomax, for those of you who don’t know, is (to borrow from his own institution’s language) considered to be America’s foremost folklorist.  In normal English, he is a guy who went out and made hundreds, if not thousands, of hours of field recordings, documenting the folk culture of communities across the States, and later further afield.

The event at Word of Mouth just off Leith Walk on Wednesday was a screening of selected clips of unseen footage from later journeys where he was able not only to record the music, but to shoot accompanying video as well. It was hosted by Screen Bandita and thoughtfully introduced by Nathan Salsburg, who works for Cultural Equity, the association charged with preserving and disseminating Lomax’s work.

Now, I went to see the Sigur Ros film INNI a while back, and in all honesty I thought it was pretty fucking boring.  I enjoyed the music, and the visuals were nice, but that is a long, long way from being a compelling film.  I sometimes think that when people make movies like that that they are woefully underestimating the craft of a film-maker.  And, actually, of a good, brutal editor, which seems to me to be just about the most important role of the lot.

So, I was a little apprehensive when this started off and it swiftly became apparent that it really was just a collection of songs, rather like a stream of YouTube clips, rather than a single film in its own right.  There was no need to be nervous though, because the diversity of music and the fascination of some of the performances made sure this was utterly compelling from start to finish.

I was struck by so many aspects of these recordings, and I don’t want to write an epic here, but for the sake of it I did want to mention a few things.

1. The difference between the performances when being filmed and when simply being recorded seemed immediately obvious.  People acted up considerably for the cameras, in ways I strongly doubt they would have for someone with a tape recorder.  I’m am not saying this is a bad thing however, and when you are documenting folk traditions and folk music, showing the role of that music in the communities which created it made the feel you got for the whole infinitely richer.

2. Commercial and folk approaches to music are at pretty direct odds.

2.1 The old lie peddled by entertainment conglomerates that if we don’t buy their records then we will lose great art is clearly bollocks.  People make art because they are compelled to do so and they gain a great deal from doing so.

You can be sure that pretty much no-one covered in this series was making a penny, but the music was stunning, and it was pretty clearly a joy based on participation, not remuneration.  I am not saying that artists shouldn’t be entitled to their share of commercial exploitation of their music, but if people cannot make it commercially viable, we will still have plenty of great art.

2.2 The way copyright is being used to prevent sharing, copying, remixing and reworking is clearly and obviously detrimental to the fundamental culture of music.  Stopping Rihanna from nicking someone kid’s killer riff and warbling over the top of it without compensating them is a compelling case, but many of the rest are not.

Listen to the following clip of Little Margaret – these particular lyrics occur paraphrased and in fragments all over the place in folk music. This makes the music richer, not poorer. If you clamp down on this too much you throttle the creative process.

3. So many old people! The folk world may not be all that ageist, but the pop world is, despite the recent surfeit of ‘heritage acts’. I know wrinklies won’t sell Heat For Music NME quite as well, but the way the voice changes with age (and I mean proper old age, not just middle age) was wonderfully clear watching these performances.

The old voices we saw wavered with fragility or burst forth with surprising strength, but they all had tremendous character and impact.  More old fuckers  in music please.  No Noel Gallagher’s High Flying Turds, and not another cynical reunion back-slapping circle jerk-a-thon, but properly old people singing beautiful songs.

4. The ‘over-supply’ of music is not a new thing.  This is a common whinge of people who are sadly desperate to be an authority on All Of Music, and also of those who feel the need to be told what to listen to by experts, but honestly, grow some fucking balls, both groups of you.  But looking at these films, there is clearly music absolutely everywhere in these communities.

Now, clearly there are more ways to express your creativity and urge for social and cultural participation these days, but that would imply that, infinite wastelands of the internet or not, there should be less music not more.  It’s just that back then we rarely, if ever, had access to the grass roots community level music from a hundred miles away, so we got on with enjoying what was going on in our own communities, even if it was no more worthy than an old dude blowing a tune on a half-empty Pepsi bottle.

So stop worrying about listening to everything, it makes you look a bit silly. Enjoy what’s happening around, whether your community is geographical or virtual or a combination of the two. Yeah, you’re going to miss out on some stuff, dry your eyes.

5. Last, but very much not least: fuck me, some of this was bloody amazing. Remind me again, why does anyone actually watch the X-Factor? The Alan Lomax Archive profile already has seventy-eight videos uploaded to YouTube, so go and watch them instead.  And thanks so much to Screen Bandita (whose mailing list I recommend you sign up for here) and to Nathan Salsburg for an amazing evening.

7 witty ripostes to Screen Bandita presents: Unseen Footage from the Alan Lomax Archive

  1. avatar

    First, thanks for the fife & drum upload – fuckin fantastic!

    It’s great anyone can pick up a set of spoons or knock out a song at your aunty Eileen’s wake on the ole joanna, bare feet wriggling in the sawdust… is it art? Who can say?

    Kind of surprised to read you peddling the anti-major label stuff, though. Until the pass-the-hat economic model has been proved by more than a few artists then it’s still the only game in town, even if it’s played on a sloping pitch with two different sized goals and with steaming great dog turds dotted all over the grass.

  2. avatar

    I am not particularly going at major labels, I am just fed up with two particular arguments, which I think are obviously bollocks:

    That without commercial incentives we will end up with no great art anymore (and that is sidestepping the issue of big labels and exactly whose commercial incentives they actually mean when they make this argument).

    And also, that more intellectual property enforcement encourages innovation. In fact, it stifles it. I am not saying we have to abandon the concept of intellectual property, but it needs to applied far more sparingly and cautiously.

  3. avatar

    I do hate major labels though, but that’s because I think they sell an absolutely appallingly bad product and because they rip off artists more than free downloaders do. But that’s a whole different argument to the one I am making here!

  4. avatar

    It’s an old argument (relative to the supernova internet) now, about the art. I’m absolutely torn: I also hate the label system & a lot of the music that comes through it. But I also love pop music, which couldn’t have happened without being in a thoroughly capitalist environment.

    Elvis would have stayed a local oddity. Chuck Berry wouldn’t have stood a chance. Curtis Mayfield would’ve probably run a shop or a church. John Lennon would’ve ended up doing a comedy routine at the end of a pier.

    We wouldn’t have backwards tape effects. Or orchestras on pop tunes. The Beach Boys would’ve had to stick with the drunk brother and the mad brother on bass & drums respectively, instead of the Wrecking Crew. Johnny Rotten would be a clerk. Strummer would’ve ended up a folk singer.

    More recently, The Gorrillaz lovely pop albums wouldn’t exist. The Xx would have faded into the internet swamp. The Streets would’ve stalled at the pirate station.

    Some art needs investment otherwise certain aspects will be at the mercy of funding bodies or artists who come from money themselves. The dole culture which funded me before my record deals is long gone. Venture capital investment is looking to be just as ugly and intrusive as the major’s.

    I’m not saying it’s impossible to create great art if you dabble or it’s just a hobby, but there have been some creations which have needed substantial investment. Some beautiful music which wouldn’t have existed without the possibility of a large music company making a large profit. And lots of people from poor backgrounds (like some of those in the Lomax films) who would still be very poor without the evil old majors.

    As I always remind myself – the revolution needs to start somewhere more fundamental than in what’s left of the music biz, although, of course, it’s all increasingly irrelevant as the incredible shrinking majors are giving you the result you want all by themselves.

    A lot of stupid people with stupidly big wage packets paying stupidly small proportions to stupid musicians who make stupid music for stupid people. (As Boy George once sang…)

    But some of that stupid music makes me feel stupidly happy.

  5. avatar

    Bollocks, totally forgot that this was on until I saw this post. Sounds like I missed a very worthwhile evening. It’ll have to be a bottle of wine and churning through the Youtube Archive for me I guess.

    Clyde Maxwell – what a histper. That trucker hat/boiler suit combo is so contrived…

  6. avatar

    histper = hipster I think

  7. avatar

    Yeah, it was bloody great. Shame on you. But the YouTube archive does look amazing, so apart from the Q&A I doubt you’ll end up having missed much.

    Tim, yeah, it’s not so much that I think the major entertainment folk are entirely misguided. I think copyright needs to exist, and I think we need to make sure that we are very much aware of the value of finding a system which lets creative people just get on with it (this applies to science and maths as well, actually, but they seem better served without commercial interests).

    But you can’t start a reasonable argument with premises which are fundamentally wrong:

    You don’t need to incentivise people to make art, it’s something the vast majority of us are compelled to do by our nature.

    And increasing copyright protection doesn’t necessarily encourage innovation or creativity. Often it stifles it by throttled the free exchange of ideas which is the cornerstone of human creative and intellectual development. It needs to be done very carefully.

    So I am not against some of the broad arguments they make, just that a lot of the premises on which they rest their case are fundamentally and obviously bollocks.

Leave a Reply

essay writing service