Song, by Toad

Posts tagged fela kuti

Matthew Young

Friday Gives You a Bunch of Fives

Gin Is Good

After a day of indolence yesterday I am back on the horse, so to speak, to bring you our favourite time-wasting indulgence: the Five Friday Favourites. I can’t think of anything more tedious and unfair on Friday than being expected to actually do the work which we are paid to sit at our desks and do, so I spend the day pottering about on the internet, sorting out artwork for Toad releases, playing silly computer games, and keeping a nice Photoshop rendering ready to pop up onto my screen should anyone happen to walk by.

What are your plans for the weekend, then? I have to do some tedious DIY stuff on Saturday like wiring up the light in the kitchen and stuff like that. Then of course there’s the small matter of installing Mrs. Toad’s gigantic fucking Mirrorball in the living room. Yes, mirrorball. It’s at least two feet across as well, so if I don’t kill myself by trying to balance on top of the ladder then I may snap my spine in half trying to lift the sodding thing up onto its hook thingy. Mind you, think how cool the Toad Sessions are going to be with that bloody great thing in the room. Splendid!

This week’s five have been submitted by Dylan from Blueback Hotrod, official Toad photographer and proud sporter of the Golden Leek award for excessive Welshness. He insists that it is currently Mo-vember, when we should all be growing beards and moustaches for charity. This sounds like a load of old bollocks to me, but I can’t be bothered to look it up, so we’ll just have to take his word for it.

See all the Edinburgh lot tomorrow night in the Bowery for Alex Cornish, and as for the rest of you, get your weekend greetings in here, and wait for tomorrow’s podcast. Have fun Toadlings.

1. Best celebrity moustache.
2. Optimum sideburn length.
3. Nasal hair: trim or pluck?
4. When does beard sculpture go too far? Discuss.
5. Your own best personal achievement in the field of facial topiary. (Alternative ladies’ question: favourite knitting pattern.)

And this week’s five random songs come from an enormous pile of music I downloaded from my friend Morgan a while back, but still haven’t had the time to go through properly.

Linton Kwesi Johnson – Bass Culture
Captain Beefheart – Grown So Ugly
Red Sovine – Phantom 409 If you’re thinking ’surely not that Phantom 409′, then the answer is yes, that Phantom 409. Fucking cool, eh.
Serge Gainsbourg – Couleur Cafe
Fela Kuti – Viva Nigeria

Matthew Young

Seriously, Why Bother Voting?

Spoiled Ballot

Because of moving around an awful lot in my life, I have rarely voted.  Now that I’m in Edinburgh I am settled enough to have voted in the last couple of elections and, now that I’ve done it, I find myself asking what the hell the point is.

That reflex response “Well if you don’t vote, you can’t complain” has always struck me as a load of old bollocks.  In fact, never mind that, it is a load of old bollocks.  When I first decided to cast my own vote, no matter how hopeless the party for whom I was voting, my reasoning was this: I didn’t want the slippery fuckers to be able to get away with it so easily.  I knew I was wasting my vote in most ways, but I just wanted to head off that criticism, that smug “Well if you didn’t vote…”

Ultimately though, voting is bordering on pointless.  Labour have moved so far to the right that the Tories are now fighting them on green issues and civil liberties – in other words, they have almost had to move to the left of Labour in order to differentiate themselves.  It’s ridiculous.  How the fuck does choosing between those two sets of snivelling lickspittles constitute any sort of meaningful choice?  How does the election of Cameron or Brown make even the tiniest difference to our day-to-day lives?  Tony Blair was essentially a Tory prime minister.  And given it makes no difference whatsoever, why are we voting?

A vote is supposed to be a choice, a statement of belief and principle, your chance to make a declaration of political allegiance and attempt to influence the way in which the country is governed.  Does anyone seriously believe that the current system, which is effectively two-party, offers us a choice in how the country is run?  Does it bollocks.  The influence of lobbyists, and hence wealth, in politics is so colossal that unless you promise to govern in a particular way, to play the game obediently, then the chances of your name even appearing on the ballot paper are basically nil.  As Tony Blair so brazenly demonstrated in the buildup to the war in Iraq, they are absolutely not accountable to us; not in the slightest.

So when we vote, what are we doing, legitimising the status quo?  It certainly feels that way.  We are basically giving the impression that we genuinely believe that choosing one special interest sock-puppet over another represents a meaingful choice for us and one which we are willing to take seriously.  Surely voter turnouts dropping to record-low levels makes more of a political statement than dutifully making an appearance and marking your box like a good little boy.  How, after all, can they claim legitimate mandate to govern when a mere twenty percent of the populace endorsed them?  They will claim it anyway of course, and blame us, but it feels like a stronger, more meaningful statement than simply choosing one bunch of toadies over another identical bunch of toadies who happen to wear differently-coloured ties.

The problem, really, is the alternative.  If you refuse to vote, which I think it a perfectly reasonable decision and one with which I am seriously toying at the moment, then how do you remain politically active?  I guess you join activist groups, participate in message boards and sites that debate political issues, and generally cherry-pick your participation in terms of single issues rather than sign up to any one morally bankrupt political party or another.  It’s politics by aggregate rather than partisan allegiance, which seems dead in the water at the moment.  Here anyway.  Look at The States and partisan tribalism has more or less engulfed the political process, and why?  I guess because they genuinely feel that picking Obama or McCain or, until recently, Clinton over the others will produce genuinely difficult outcomes for the country.

Over here, does anyone seriously believe Cameron, Blair, Brown or any of these twits are significantly different from one another?  The great success of the Scottish National Party this year has been their mediocre inoffensiveness, allowing them to play the nationalist card, which in much of Scotland translates as borderline racism, and thus mobilise the bovine masses without seriously threatening to do anything meaningful which might upset anyone.  Or, more significantly, make them give a shit one way or another.

So what are we left with?  I am increasingly finding myself in a situation where I can barely justify voting.  I would rather a pathetically low turnout, as political statements go, to pottering along voting for this or that identikit besuited mannequin and continuing to give the impression that they are actually doing their jobs.  They are not.  We are not being listened to.  Our votes are fucking meaningless.  And what can we do, spoil the ballot?  Maybe.  Not vote?  I don’t know.  I wouldn’t be happy with that at all, it just doesn’t feel right, and of course it is impossible to differentiate between the indifferent non-voter and the pointed non-voter.  So it may be difficult to make a statement that way, but it is very close to being the only real statement we can make as an electorate.  Is this too disillusioned for a Friday?  Sorry.  Have some gin and forget I ever said this.

Fela Kuti – Government Chicken Boy
Billy Bragg – NPWA
Radiohead – Electioneering

Matthew Young

Reading is Changing, But Some Things Aren’t

Burning Books

I read an interesting but slightly frustrating article in The Scotsman the other day, all about kids’ top ten favourite and least favourite things to read. There was a fair bit of hand-wringing about the emergence of blogs and lyrics websites in the favourites, and the inevitable presence of Shakespeare in the least favourite – not among the writers, funnily enough, but among the parents of the kids in question.

This is an age-old conservative reactionary mistake (we all have a conservative reactionary inside us somewhere, this is not a political dig) of confusing the medium with the content. There is nothing inherently good about a book, nor superficial about a website. There are some pretty shitty books out there, there really are, just as there are a massive number of pointless, vacuous websites. I have learned a lot recently from excellent blogs and sites written by the exact same professionals that write the books.

It is one of the things that people who lay into the online world as full of lies and fluff (which it certainly can be, I am not denying that) tend to forget: a lot of the time the actual, genuine experts cross media quite happily, often so they bring to bear the full weight of their knowledge and expertise unshackled by editors and sponsors with agendas and word counts. And then of course there are some very talented amateurs to be found as well.

Aside from that, the idea that books are inherently good because they are books is also silly. Have any of you seen some of the empty headed, badly written, poorly conceived, scantly characterised and just plain fucking inaccurate stuff that gets published? I have read some genuinely awful, awful books in my time.

Websites are interesting because they drive home what is going to become one of the central skills of the internet era: the ability to interpret the quality of information. Anyone who thought history class was pointless is suddenly going to have to think again, because the concept of primary and secondary sources and the ability to evaluate the agenda of the writer is becoming crucial. This always existed with books, but people tended to be less aware of it. Political and historical books in particular have always needed careful scrutiny for the bias of the author, and often the publisher as well.

This is even more the case with websites, not because they’re so unreliable, but because a lot of them are very good indeed. If it was all bollocks this would be obvious fairly quickly, but it’s actually the good ones that make the crap ones harder to spot.

There is some evidence that kids are getting pretty good at evaluating what they are reading (note lack of source: bad information) and I would honestly have more faith in the abilities of people who have grown up in the internet world than people who have not. Adults are proving particularly bad at critically evaluating what they are being fed online as well. Forming little echo-chambers of people who will never challenge your opinions is pretty easy on the internet, and even when people do use evidence to add weight to their views by linking to papers and studies, they are often able to lie blatantly about the contents, safe in the knowledge that no-one will ever follow up.

So rather than teaching our kids that the internet is bad and books are good, or that people in chatrooms are paedophiles (honestly, it’s just not that easy to pick up teenagers in chatrooms, and believe me, I’ve tried) we should instead be focussing on a lesson absolutely all of us need to learn: how to tell the good shit from the bad shit and, when someone tells you something, to make sure that it is true. When the differences can be very subtle indeed and there is always someone with a lot to gain from fooling you, it is becoming both harder and way more important.

Eels – Old Shit/New Shit
Belle & Sebastian – Put the Book Back on the Shelf
The Decemberists – Billy Liar
Gene – Truth, Rest Your Head (Live)
Fela Kuti – Truth Don Die